Three Vendors, One Roof, Three Different Generation Figures.
Ask three vendors to quote a rooftop plant and you will get three annual generation figures for the same roof, the same location and roughly the same capacity — sometimes differing by a fifth. Since the sun is not negotiable, the difference is entirely in what was assumed.
The headline kWh figure is an output of a model, and the model's inputs are where the disagreement lives.
What drives the spread
- Shading, and how it was assessed. The largest single variable. A model built from a site survey with actual obstructions — parapets, water tanks, AHUs, adjacent buildings, chimneys — produces a very different figure from one assuming a clear rectangle.
- How shading loss is calculated. Partial shading on a string does not reduce output proportionally to the shaded area; it can disproportionately affect the string depending on module and inverter topology. A model treating shade as a simple percentage understates it.
- Soiling assumption. Dust deposition in North Indian industrial areas is materially higher than a default. An optimistic soiling figure quietly adds several percent.
- Temperature losses. Module output falls as cell temperature rises, and Indian summer roof temperatures are punishing. Mounting height and ventilation behind the module change this.
- DC:AC ratio and clipping. Oversizing the array relative to the inverter raises annual yield but clips peaks. Whether clipping was modelled honestly moves the number.
- Degradation and availability. Year-one versus lifetime average, and what downtime was assumed.
Reading an estimate properly
| Ask for | What it reveals |
|---|---|
| The loss diagram, not just the yield | Every assumption, line by line — this is the document that matters |
| Performance ratio (PR) | A PR that looks too good usually means losses were understated |
| The irradiation source used | Different datasets give different baselines for the same site |
| Whether a physical shading survey was done | Distinguishes a modelled roof from a visited one |
| Soiling percentage assumed | Compare against the actual dust environment |
A vendor who supplies the loss diagram is showing their working. One who supplies only a kWh figure and a payback has given you a conclusion without a method.
Why the optimistic estimate is the expensive one
Because it sets the payback the investment was approved on. When the plant generates below the figure the business case used, the shortfall is discovered in year one and argued about thereafter — and as covered in what solar generation guarantees actually cover, the remedy depends entirely on how the guarantee was written.
Structural capacity is the other gate worth settling before yield is discussed at all — see rooftop structural loading on older roofs.
What we do differently
Our Solar EPC proposals include the loss diagram and the shading assessment behind the number, so you are comparing methods rather than optimism. The shadow-free area calculator gives an independent first check before anyone quotes.
More insights
The Array Is Built. The Protection Settings Decide Whether It Ever Exports.
A rooftop plant cannot export until the DISCOM is satisfied it will disconnect safely, protect its own network, and stay within limits. Those requirements sit in the protection settings and the interconnection documentation, not in the panels.
Solar EnergyA Plant Down 8% Looks Exactly Like a Plant Working Fine.
Solar underperformance is invisible from the ground and rarely obvious in the monitoring portal. Aerial thermography inspects every module in a fraction of the time a manual survey takes — and finds the specific failures that inverter data cannot localise.