Solar design review for East African factories

Capacity and connection

Reconcile module capacity, inverter output, the connection limit and the capacity accepted for the application. Identify the documents still needed from the utility.

Export and billing

Confirm whether export is permitted, how credits are calculated, which charges remain and whether unused credit expires. Keep unconfirmed terms visible as assumptions.

Operating conditions

Include production hours, weekends, shutdowns, site conditions and the grid-generator interface. Check whether the savings model uses the same assumptions as the drawings.

Local responsibility

Name the appropriately authorised local professional responsible for verification, signing, applications and site work before agreeing the review scope.

Size against real load

Maximum demand may set the limit, but your daytime load decides the useful size. Weekends, shutdowns and planned growth all change the answer.

Savings that hold up

A savings figure should separate units used on site from units exported, and show any credit that could be lost. We check whether the claim follows from the proposal's own numbers.

Grid and generator interface

Outages, changeover and protection shape the design as much as the roof does. We check that solar, grid and generator are shown working together, with altitude stated where it matters.

Sector 43 drawing and BOQ revisions

Our published project record includes correspondence recording revised fire-fighting drawings and BOQ submitted for review for the Sector 43 parking project.

The submission records revision activity; it does not establish authority approval or completed installation.

NXP MEP design

Our company profile identifies a bespoke MEP design role for NXP. The published case sets out the recorded role and considerations for a similar design appointment.

The project location remains unreconciled. The profile reference does not establish experience in East Africa, a certified performance result or an approval outcome.